social science writing question and need the explanation and answer to help me learn.

Hello, the following workbook, when put in through, says that there is 35% AI detection. I need it re written so it says no AI detection.
Sexuality and Sexual Identities
Student’s Name
Institutional Affiliation
Instructor’s Name
Course Name

Sexuality and Sexual Identities
Week #1: Introduction
Comparing and Contrasting Own Experiences With the Sex Education Curriculum to Oliver’s Episode about “Sex Education”:
After watching Oliver’s episode about “Sex Education” (2018), I see several similarities to my experiences with the sex education curriculum. The state of sex education in the U.S. is exceptionally divided and conflicting. As in the video, there is no normalized obligatory sex education program nationwide, and the quality of information given to students varies generally (Oliver, 2018). While some schools may concentrate on programs that promote abstinence alone or may choose to ignore the topic entirely, others may provide comprehensive and restoratively accurate instruction on sexual education. This lack of uniformity may result in a patchwork system that gives students uneven access to important knowledge regarding relationships and sexual health.
The film also emphasizes the need to provide comprehensive sex education that covers topics like healthy relationships, consent, and contraception. The disparate standards in sex education leave many kids, including those in the video, confused and misinformed. Educational institutions must provide students with accurate and useful information so they can make decisions about their relationships and sexual health. Without appropriate sex training, young people might not have the tools they need to navigate the complexities of their sexuality and might be in danger of negative consequences like unplanned pregnancies or sexually transmitted infections (Plaček, 2023, SOC 180A Lecture 10-4-2023). The absence of standardized, thorough sex education in the U.S. is a huge concern, and it is vital to address this issue better to prepare young people for a healthy and informed future.
I encountered sex education in a very different way than what Oliver’s “Sex Training” (2018) episode emphasized. I had the good fortune to receive a somewhat thorough education about sex that included topics like consent, sexual health, human anatomy, and contraception. It emphasized how important it is to make educated judgments and engage in safe sexual behavior. The curriculum focused on giving kids the knowledge and resources they needed to explore their sexual health appropriately; it was age- and medically-appropriate. My sex education was standardized, consistent, and inclusive, as opposed to the disjointed structure shown in the film, and it sought to give students the knowledge and skills needed to make wise decisions regarding their sexual health. However, I do perceive that my encounters may not be representative of the broader spectrum of sex education across the United States.
Recommendations for Ideal Curriculum and Why:
Three important suggestions should be taken into account for the best sex education initiatives. First, these courses ought to be factually grounded in medical knowledge and data, guaranteeing that students learn about anatomy, sexual health, and contraception. In myths and misconceptions, this precision is vital. Secondly, sex education should emphasize the significance of consent, communication, and healthy relationships, empowering students to settle on informed choices and keep up with respectful interactions. Finally, these programs should be inclusive and sensitive to diverse identities and orientations, recognizing that people have various encounters and needs. Comprehensive and inclusive sex education encourages a more informed, respectful, and safe environment for young people, diminishing the risks related to sexual activity and promoting healthy sexual relationships.
Week #2: Media
Jenji Kohan emphasizes the value of excellent writing by focusing his arguments on the notion that outstanding writers ought to be selected more on the basis of their storytelling prowess than their identities (Halperin, 2014). Her point of view might result in writing that places a higher value on imaginative storytelling and narrative brilliance, possibly downplaying the importance of particular demographic issues for writers. Jill Soloway, on the other hand, argues that the “Transparent” crew needs a trans writer in order to avoid “othering” the trans character and strive for a more accurate portrayal of the transgender experience. Soloway’s stance might result in content emphasizing an accurate and nuanced portrayal of transgender lives, potentially deepening the show’s characters and themes. In a writer’s room, it’s recommended to have a mix of writers with diverse backgrounds and experiences, including transgender individuals, to ensure a well-rounded and authentic portrayal of transgender characters. This approach helps prevent tokenization and provides a broader range of perspectives.
Week #3: Discourses & Identity Management
Functions That Each of These Narratives Could Serve:
Identity talk plays a variety of roles in the context of Tinder profiles, reflecting the many ways individuals promote themselves on the dating app (Plaček, 2023, SOC 180A Lecture 10-16-2323). Identity discourse serves the purpose of embracing oneself, in which people freely accept and acknowledge particular facets of who they are. Take the phrase “Proud foodie and wine enthusiast,” for example, which honors their passion for both. Through this feature, individuals can establish relationships based on common interests and values with possible mates.
Stigma distancing is another function of identity discourse observed on Tinder profiles. Users occasionally use this strategy to disassociate themselves from stigmatized traits or stereotypes. For example, “Software engineer, but I promise I’m not a typical techie.” This feature dispels popular misconceptions about particular identities or careers, resulting in a more genuine and approachable image. Distancing oneself from stigma can make people stand out by allowing them to show a more complete picture of who they are that transcends stereotypes and cultural biases.
What the Author Seem To Want To Express/Convey About Themselves:
In the selected Tinder profiles, the authors aim to express a multifaceted identity, suggesting they are seeking connections that go beyond superficial aspects. They want to convey that they are individuals with diverse interests and dimensions (Green & Bey, 2017). For instance, the user states, “Adventure seeker, coffee lover, and avid reader.” Here, the author presents themselves as someone who appreciates a mix of experiences, from seeking adventure to enjoying quiet moments with a book, indicating they are open to various interactions, from exciting adventures to cozy coffee dates. They seek someone who values various activities and can engage in them together.
The second profile illustrates a desire for meaningful and authentic connections. The user writes, “Looking for someone who can appreciate dad jokes and deep conversations.” Here, the writer is showing that they are attracted to deep discussions as well as humor, and they might be searching for a mate who can strike a balance between the two. This imparts a desire for deep conversations and genuine connections that go beyond and include comedy. These biographies exhibit the writers’ desire for well-rounded people and relationships that let them explore different aspects of their characters.
Week #4: Hookup Culture
How the Aspects Of The Girl Hunt and Hookup Culture Are Portrayed In The TV Episode:
In the T.V. episode “Entergalactic,” different parts of the girl hunt and hookup culture are depicted inside a modern and vivid setting. The show dives into the intricacies of human connections in a technology-driven society (Intergalactic, 2022). It features how characters explore modern dating and sexual interactions, frequently blurring the lines between genuine connections and casual experiences. The utilization of advanced technology and virtual reality elements in the story embodies how these viewpoints have developed in the future, where people appear to be more associated and detached from real emotions, reflecting the consistently advancing scene of hookup culture and the difficulties it presents in forming meaningful relationships.
The portrayal of dating and hookups in the T.V. episode “Entergalactic” builds up norms and expectations commonly associated with present-day relationships. It depicts the assumption for innovation assuming a critical part in interfacing individuals with characters utilizing progressed devices and computer-generated reality to track down possible accomplices. The story recommends a standard of comfort, as characters can investigate heartfelt and sexual associations easily through these mechanical connection points. Simultaneously, it builds up the possibility that these innovative headways can prompt shallower associations, accentuating the easygoing and frequently value-based nature of numerous communications. Also, the episode mirrors the standard of moment satisfaction in dating and hookups, as characters can rapidly move, starting with one experience and then onto the next, reflecting the speedy idea of contemporary hookup culture.
Norms/Expectations the Depiction Reinforce About Dating or Hook Ups:
A captivating depiction of gender and sexuality converging performances might be found in the television show “Entergalactic.” One person, a Black Woman, represents the nexus of gender, race, and sexuality. Her story highlights the new challenges and prejudices Black women encounter when dating (Armstrong et al., 2014). The episode portrays her as confident and assertive, defying the traditional stereotypes associated with Black women, but also challenges her in her interactions with others. This portrayal highlights the intersectional problems associated with Black women being objectified and fetishized in the dating world and has wider social ramifications addressing how race affects dating dynamics.
Another character in the episode, a working-class man, showcases the intersection of gender and class. His economic status influences his dating experiences, as he struggles to compete with wealthier individuals who use advanced technology for dating and hookups. This representation sheds light on the challenges working-class men face in the dating sphere, highlighting how class disparities can significantly impact one’s success and self-esteem. It underscores broader social implications regarding the influence of socioeconomic factors on dating dynamics and the perpetuation of class-based hierarchies in contemporary hookup culture.
Week #5: Relationships
Interviewees Experiences:
The dating landscape of today has been greatly affected by the concepts of least interest, temporal sequencing, and the impact of technology on communication, as I have learned from “Modern Romance” (Plaček, 2023, SOC 180A Lecture 10-24-2023). In conversations with a friend, she revealed that many spouses live close to one another, reflecting a family-oriented approach to relationships. “Emerging adulthood” is characterized by a focus on education, career, dating, self-discovery, individualism, later marriages, and romantic love or soulmates. With people spending so much time on their phones, the world of phones has a big impact on modern dating. This leads to pressures, disappointments, expectations, and choices. It becomes clear how social movements, jobs, urbanization, transportation, and technology affect dating dynamics.
According to her, in relationships, it becomes evident that “real” individuals believe in it and invest time and effort into each other. A “healthy” relationship requires self-awareness, regular self and partner check-ins, emotional security, effective communication, and respect for each other’s boundaries. Jealousy, although common, often points to unresolved trauma, insecurity, personal or mental health issues, a lack of trust, or unmet needs. The types of relationships encompass hookups, friends with benefits, sneaky links, and the process of defining the relationship (DTR). These relationship dynamics can be platonic, romantic, sexual, headspace, relational, transactional, short-term, or long-term, with committed relationships and partnerships taking various forms. Ethical non-monogamy and relationship anarchy offer alternative models prioritizing consent, boundaries, and open communication. Relationship commitments are explored, including infidelity, ethical non-monogamy, and relationship anarchy, emphasizing respecting prearranged rules and boundaries while retaining a commitment to the relationship.
Views on Current Tech & Contexts:
The interviewee express mixed feelings about today are dating contexts, technologies, and cultures (Kang & Kang, 2015). She appreciates the convenience and accessibility offered by dating apps and online platforms, which allow them to connect with potential partners more easily. She acknowledges the role of technology in broadening their dating pool and providing more options. However, there is also a sense of nostalgia for traditional dating methods, with the interviewee missing the personal, face-to-face interactions and the sense of mystery and excitement that came with dating in the past. She express concerns about the depersonalization of dating through technology and the challenges of finding genuine connections in a digital world.
The respondent recognizes that dating cultures are changing in terms of expectations and conventions. She understands that casual partnerships, hookup culture, and other non-monogamous arrangements are common. She acknowledges the diversity and flexibility that come with dating in the modern world. Still, she also expresses her dissatisfaction with the disposable nature of relationships and the lack of commitment. There is a perception that the abundance of possibilities made possible by technology has altered the dynamics of dating, with both advantageous and disadvantageous outcomes.

Armstrong, E. A., Hamilton, L. T., Armstrong, E. M., & Seeley, J. L. (2014). “Good Girls” gender, social class, and slut discourse on campus. Social Psychology Quarterly, 77(2), 100-122.
Entergalactic [Video]. (2022). YouTube. 
Green, K. M., & Bey, M. (2017). Where Black feminist thought and trans* feminism meet: A conversation. Souls, 19(4), 438-454.
John Oliver. (2018). Sex Education [Video]. YouTube. 
Kang & Kang. (2015). The Beautiful Truth About Online Dating [Video]. YouTube. 
Moze Halperin. (2014). Dissecting Jenji Kohan and Jill Soloway’s Clash Over Trans Representation on TV. 
Plaček, 2023 SOC 180A Lecture 10-16-2323
Plaček, 2023 SOC 180A Lecture 10-24-2023
 Plaček, 2023 SOC 180A Lecture 10-4-2023