writing question and need guidance to help me learn.
Requirements: 1000words
This document is intended for Coventry University Group students for their own use in completing their assessed work for this module. It must not be passed to third parties or posted on any website. Page 1 of 11 Student Assignment Brief This document is intended for Coventry University Group students for their own use in completing their assessed work for this module. It must not be passed to third parties or posted on any website. If you require this document in an alternative format, please contact your Module Leader. Assignment Information The work you submit for this assignment must be your own independent work, or in the case of group assignment your own groupsÕ work. More information is available in the ÔAssessment TaskÕ section of this assignment brief. Module Name: Globalisation and Emerging Markets Module Code: 6025SSL Assignment Title Individual Live Presentation Assignment Due: 30/10/2023 at 18:00 UK Time Assignment Type: Only one of the following apply to this assignment task. Pass or Fail (Core Assessment) You will be provided with either a pass or a fail grade. You will have PLEASE SELECT to successfully complete your assessment before the end of the module. Percentage Grade (Applied Core Assessment) You will be provided with an overall grade between 0% and 100%. You have one opportunity to pass the assignment at or above 40%. Assignment Task This assignment requires you to produce a 10Ð15-minute presentation selecting ONLY ONE of the following questions/ topics: 1. Taking a specific country as an illustration, what advantages do various stakeholders (Host Governments, MNCs, and citizens) experience through the privatisation of public assets in Emerging Markets? 2. Using a company/industry/sector of your choice discuss the ways in which AI is reshaping the business landscape in emerging markets, and what benefits and potential regulatory implications does it present? 3. In what ways can regional economic integration enhance market access and create new business opportunities for companies operating within the region? Use a country of your choice as an example.
This document is intended for Coventry University Group students for their own use in completing their assessed work for this module. It must not be passed to third parties or posted on any website. Page 2 of 11 4. How can multinational corporations effectively integrate Environmental Social and Governance (ESG) principles, ethical practices, and social responsibility initiatives in their operations within emerging markets? Submission Instructions: – You will submit your presentation slides on Turnitin which you will utilise for your Live presentation by the deadline of this assignment. – The Module team will release timeslots for your presentation indicating time and place where you will need to attend and deliver it on campus. – The Module team will record your presentation for marking/ moderation purposes. Time Specifications The presentation time limit is minimum 10 (ten) minutes and a maximum of 15 (fifteen) minutes. There will be a penalty of a deduction of 10% of the mark (after internal moderation) for work exceeding the time limit by 10% or more. The time limit includes all annotated slides with spoken words except the references list. Marking and Feedback Your assignment will be marked by the module team . Provisional grades will be released once internally moderated . Feedback will be provided by the module team alongside grades release . You can expect to have marked work returned to you TEN working days after submission deadline. If for any reason there is a delay you will be kept informed. Marks and feedback will be provided online. As always, marks will have been internally moderated only, and will therefore be provisional; your mark will be formally agreed later in the year once the external examiner has completed his / her review. . Details of the marking criteria for this task can be found at the bottom of this assignment brief.
This document is intended for Coventry University Group students for their own use in completing their assessed work for this module. It should not be passed to third parties or posted on any website. Page 3 of 11 Module Learning Outcomes: The Learning Outcomes for this module align to the marking criteria which can be found at the end of this brief. Ensure you understand the marking criteria to ensure successful achievement of the assessment task. The following module learning outcomes are assessed in this task: 1. Critically evaluate the impact of cultural, demographic, ecological, economic, legal, political, social, and technological environments on international business. 2. Critically assess the various operational strategies used in markets that are in differing stages of economic development. 4. Discuss and justify relevant business strategies and activities within specified cross-cultural and international settings. Assignment Support and Academic Integrity If you have any questions about this assignment or require information on Extenuating Circumstances, please see the Student Guidance on Coursework for more information. Spelling, Punctuation, and Grammar: You are expected to use effective, accurate, and appropriate language within this assessment task. Academic Integrity: The work you submit must be your own work. We use detection software and make routine checks for evidence of academic misconduct. Definitions of academic misconduct, including plagiarism, self-plagiarism, and collusion can be found on the Student Portal. All cases of suspected academic misconduct are referred for investigation, the outcomes of which can have profound consequences to your studies. For more information on academic integrity please visit the Academic and Research Integrity section of the Student Portal. Support for Students with Disabilities or Additional Needs: If you have a disability, long-term health condition, specific learning difference, mental health diagnosis or symptoms and have discussed your support needs with health and wellbeing you may be able to access support that will help with your studies. If you feel you may benefit from additional support, but have not disclosed a disability to the University, or have disclosed but are yet to discuss your support needs it is important to let us know so we can provide the right support for your circumstances. Visit the Student Portal to find out more. Administration of Assessment Module Leader Name Kiev Ariza Module Leader Email ad4679@coventry.ac.uk Assignment Category Live Component Code Cw1 Attempt Type Standard Assessment Credit 10 Credits
This document is intended for Coventry University Group students for their own use in completing their assessed work for this module. It should not be passed to third parties or posted on any website. Page 4 of 11
This document is intended for Coventry University Group students for their own use in completing their assessed work for this module. It should not be passed to third parties or posted on any website. Page 5 of 11 Assessment Marking Criteria Globalisation and Emerging Markets Mark Band Outcome Theory & Literature 25% Analysis 25% Critique 25% Presentation 25% 90-100% 1st Meets Learning Outcomes Evidence of exceptional research well beyond the minimum recommended, using a range of methodologies. Exceptional understanding of knowledge and subject specific theories and concepts with evidence of originality and autonomy. Arguments are exceptional, nuanced and well supported by a variety of literature. Exceptional analytical skills. Insightful and perceptive analysis that demonstrates both the depth and breadth of the issues with excellent examples. Exceptional integration of theory into practice such that new contributions to knowledge are emergent. Well-developed problem-solving skills with an exceptional ability to apply learning resources. Demonstrates creativity and a high degree of originality and autonomy. Exceptional work demonstrating a very high degree of understanding, creativity and criticality. Demonstrates exceptional judgement based on arguments consistently supported by relevant literature. Logical, nuanced and complex argument presented. Demonstrates a creative and critically engaged command of the literature and context that enables new contributions to knowledge. Completed to a very high degree of accuracy, proficiency and autonomy. Exceptional communication and expression with evidence of professional skill set. Exceptional confidence with material, articulation, eye contact, gestures, and enthusiasm. Demonstrated exceptional audience engagement and held their attention with creative articulation, enthusiasm, and focus. Demonstrated exceptionally effective language and pronunciation. Easy to understand and comprehend. Exceptional slide show, video/other technology used where applicable, eye-catching graphics. 80-89% 1st Evidence of outstanding research well beyond minimum recommended, using a range of methodologies. Outstanding understanding of knowledge and subject specific theories and Outstanding analytical skills. Insightful and perceptive analysis, demonstrating both the depth and breadth of the issues with excellent examples. Outstanding integration of theory into practice such that Outstanding work demonstrating a high degree of understanding, creativity and criticality. Demonstrates outstanding judgement based on arguments consistently supported by relevant Outstanding confidence with material, articulation, eye contact, gestures, and enthusiasm. Demonstrated outstanding audience engagement and held
This document is intended for Coventry University Group students for their own use in completing their assessed work for this module. It should not be passed to third parties or posted on any website. Page 6 of 11 concepts with evidence of originality and autonomy. Outstanding arguments, nuanced and well supported by a variety of literature. new contributions to knowledge maybe emergent. Clear evidence of problem-solving skills with an outstanding ability to apply learning resources. Demonstrates creativity, originality and autonomy. literature. Logical, nuanced and complex argument presented. Demonstrates a creative and critically engaged command of the literature and context such that new contributions to knowledge are considered possible. Completed to a high degree of accuracy, proficiency and autonomy. Outstanding communication and expression with evidence of professional skill set. their attention with creative articulation, enthusiasm, and focus. Demonstrated outstandingly effective language and pronunciation. Easy to understand and comprehend. Outstanding slide show, video/other technology used where applicable, eye-catching graphics. 70-79% 1st Excellent research well beyond the minimum recommended, using a range of methodologies. Excellent understanding of knowledge and subject-specific theories and concepts with evidence of considerable originality and autonomy. Excellent arguments, nuanced and well supported by a variety of literature. Excellent analytical skills. Insightful and perceptive analysis demonstrating both the depth and breadth of the issues with excellent examples. Excellent integration of theory into practice. Clear evidence of problem-solving skills and an excellent ability to apply learning resources. Demonstrates creativity, originality and autonomy. Excellent work clearly evidencing understanding, creativity and criticality. Demonstrates coherent argument and interpretation consistently supported by relevant literature. Logical, nuanced and complex argument presented. Demonstrates an excellent creative and critically engaged command of the literature and context. Completed with accuracy, proficiency and considerable autonomy. Excellent communication and expression with some evidence of professional skill set. Demonstrated excellent confidence with material, articulation, eye contact, gestures, and enthusiasm. Demonstrated excellent audience engagement and held their attention with creative enthusiasm and focus. Demonstrated excellent and effective language and pronunciation. Easy to understand. Excellent slide show, video/other technology used where applicable.
This document is intended for Coventry University Group students for their own use in completing their assessed work for this module. It should not be passed to third parties or posted on any website. Page 7 of 11 60-69% 2:1 Thorough research, using established methodologies accurately, beyond the recommended minimum with little, if any, irrelevant material present. Very good understanding of knowledge and subject-specific theories and concepts with some originality and autonomy. Very good arguments, nuanced and well supported by a variety of literature. Very good analytical skills. Analysis demonstrating both the breadth and depth of the issues. Well chosen, well justified and insightful examples provided. Very good integration of theory into practice. Demonstrates some originality, creativity and problem solving skills and a very good application of learning resources. Very good work demonstrating strong understanding of theories, concepts and issues with clear evidence of criticality. Demonstrates coherent, substantiated, supported argument and interpretation. Logical and nuanced argument presented. Demonstrates a very good creative and critically engaged command of the literature and context. Sense is made of the issues identified with the support of relevant literature. Completed with accuracy, proficiency and autonomy. Very good communication and expression with evidence of professional skill set. Demonstrated very good confidence with material, articulation, eye contact, gestures, and enthusiasm. Demonstrated very good audience engagement and held their attention with enthusiasm Demonstrated very good and effective language and pronunciation. Reasonably easy to understand. Very good slide show, video/other technology used where applicable. 50-59% 2:2 Research undertaken accurately using established methodologies and drawing on a good range of relevant literature. Enquiry beyond that recommended may be present. Some errors may be present and some inclusion of irrelevant material. Good understanding of knowledge and subject-specific theories and Good analytical skills. Analysis demonstrating both the breadth and depth of the issues. Well chosen, well justified examples provided. Good integration of theory into practice. Demonstrates some originality, creativity and problem-solving skills though with inconsistencies. A good ability to apply learning resources. Good understanding of relevant theories, concepts and issues with some criticality. Demonstrates logical argument and interpretation with supporting evidence. Demonstrates a good creative and critically engaged command of the literature and context. Consistent attempts to make sense of the issues identified Demonstrated good confidence with material, articulation, eye contact, gestures, and enthusiasm. Demonstrated good audience engagement Demonstrated good and language. Fairly easy to understand. A good slide show/video, some
This document is intended for Coventry University Group students for their own use in completing their assessed work for this module. It should not be passed to third parties or posted on any website. Page 8 of 11 concepts with indications of originality and autonomy. Good arguments well supported by a variety of literature. with the support of relevant literatures. Expression and presentation mostly accurate, proficient, and conducted with some autonomy. Good communication and expression with appropriate professional skill set. relative technology used where applicable. 40-40% 3rd Research scope sufficient to evidence use of some established methodologies. Some irrelevant material likely to be present. Demonstrates an understanding of knowledge and subject-specific theories sufficient to deal with concepts. Arguments supported by a variety of literature. Adequate levels of analysis demonstrated but with some lapses into descriptions or practice. Adequate number and/or depth of examples provided. Adequate use of theory to make sense of practice. Demonstrates some originality, creativity and problem-solving skills but with inconsistencies. A basic ability to apply learning resources. Meets the learning outcomes with a basic understanding of relevant theories, concepts and issues. Demonstrates the ability to devise and sustain an argument with a basic level of criticality. Adequate logic but argument can sometimes be difficult to follow. Some evidence of a creative and critically engaged command of the literature and context. Adequate attempt to make sense of the issues identified with the support of relevant literatures. Expression and presentation sufficient for accuracy and proficiency. Sufficient communication and expression with basic professional skill set. Demonstrated a just below average degree of confidence with material, articulation, eye contact, and gestures. Demonstrated minimal audience engagement. Demonstrated reasonable language. Some parts of presentation were a little difficult to understand. An average slide show/video, some little additional technology used where applicable.
This document is intended for Coventry University Group students for their own use in completing their assessed work for this module. It should not be passed to third parties or posted on any website. Page 9 of 11 30-39% Fail Fails to Achieve Learning Outcomes Little evidence of research and use of established methodologies. Demonstrates a weak knowledge and understanding of key theories and concepts. Minimal references to relevant literatures leading to unsupported assertions. Some relevant material present. Deficiencies evident in analysis with undeveloped examples provided. Weak links between theory and practice. Very limited originality, creativity and struggles with problem-solving skills. Limited ability to apply learning resources. Fail – very limited understanding of relevant theories and concepts. Arguments are weak and poorly constructed. Many unsupported assertions and judgements made. Lacks evidence of a creative and critically engaged command of the literature and context Fundamental errors and some misunderstanding likely to be present. Expression and presentation insufficient for accuracy and proficiency. Insufficient communication and expression and with deficiencies in professional skill set. Demonstrated below required degree of confidence with material, articulation, eye contact, and gestures. Failed to engage audience to a minimal required level. Poor use of language and difficult to understand. Below average slide show/video, where applicable. 20-29% Fail Minimal evidence of research and use of established methodologies and incomplete knowledge of the area. Limited evidence of reading. Demonstrates an inadequate knowledge of key theories and concepts. No analysis but descriptive. Irrelevant or obscure examples provided. Minimal to no links between theory and practice. Little evidence of originality, creativity and problem-solving skills. Little evidence of ability to apply learning resources. Clear failure demonstrating little understanding of relevant theories, concepts and issues. Arguments are very weak with no evidence of alternative view. No evidence of a creative and critically engaged command of the literature and context Demonstrated very little confidence with material, articulation, eye contact, and gestures. Serious and fundamental aspects missing. Failed to engage audience to a minimal required level.
This document is intended for Coventry University Group students for their own use in completing their assessed work for this module. It should not be passed to third parties or posted on any website. Page 10 of 11 Serious and fundamental aspects missing. Expression and presentation deficient for accuracy and proficiency. Insufficient communication and expression and with deficiencies in professional skill set. Very poor use of language and difficult to understand and follow. Very poor slide show/video, where applicable. 0-19% Fail No evidence of research. Material may be entirely irrelevant. No evidence of analysis. Very weak or no evidence of originality, creativity and problem solving skills. Inadequate evidence of ability to apply the learning resources. Clear failure – inadequate understanding of relevant theories, concepts and issues. No evidence of logical argument and no evidence of alternative views. No evidence of a creative and critically engaged command of the literature and context. Unsupported assertions and value judgements made throughout. Virtually no understanding of the assignment brief. Assessment may be fundamentally wrong or with major elements missing. Not a serious attempt. Expression and presentation extremely weak for accuracy and proficiency. Communication and Failed to demonstrate any confidence with material, articulation, eye contact, and gestures. Presentation may be entirely irrelevant, fundamentally wrong, or with major elements missing. Not a serious attempt. No, or little attempt made to engage audience to a minimal required level. Very poor use of language and very difficult to understand. Very poor slide show/video, where applicable.
This document is intended for Coventry University Group students for their own use in completing their assessed work for this module. It should not be passed to third parties or posted on any website. Page 11 of 11 expression very weak and with significant deficiencies in professional skill set.
